Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
Hey all..
I know you can find this on other sites, but here goes. I have definitely verified that this works in the United States. I am not sure if it works abroad as you may or may not have different coding.
Although in the USA, food manufacturers are not required to label their food (disgusting ), they do have to code their crop.
There are 3 different codes to look for.. it will either be a 5 digit or 4 digit code.
2 codes which have 5 digits....
A code that starts with an 8 and is 5 digits = genetically modified food.
A code that is 5 digits that starts with a 9 = organically grown.
A code with 4 digits, that seem to always start with the number 4 = conventionally grown.
It would be interesting if this works in other countries as well. Obviously anything that is in a package has modified ingredients.
As some wise person told me long ago.. IF you decide to shop at a supermarket, never go down the aisles, only the outer ring!
Cheers!
I know you can find this on other sites, but here goes. I have definitely verified that this works in the United States. I am not sure if it works abroad as you may or may not have different coding.
Although in the USA, food manufacturers are not required to label their food (disgusting ), they do have to code their crop.
There are 3 different codes to look for.. it will either be a 5 digit or 4 digit code.
2 codes which have 5 digits....
A code that starts with an 8 and is 5 digits = genetically modified food.
A code that is 5 digits that starts with a 9 = organically grown.
A code with 4 digits, that seem to always start with the number 4 = conventionally grown.
It would be interesting if this works in other countries as well. Obviously anything that is in a package has modified ingredients.
As some wise person told me long ago.. IF you decide to shop at a supermarket, never go down the aisles, only the outer ring!
Cheers!
wired_in- Member

- Posts: 5
Join date: 2010-02-24
Re: Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
wired_in thats some excellent information..thankyou and welcome to the forum 
wonder if its the same in australia..someone should start a list of GM ones
wonder if its the same in australia..someone should start a list of GM ones
Rising food prices may start with seeds
Once elites gained control of seeds, food inflation is inevitable...
Rising food prices may start with seeds
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/11/business/la-fi-food-monopoly12-2010mar12
Rising food prices may start with seeds
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/11/business/la-fi-food-monopoly12-2010mar12
Farmers say consolidation in the industry means they're forced to buy more costly seeds. But Monsanto, the world's largest seed firm, says competition 'is alive and flourishing.'
March 11, 2010|By P.J. HuffstutterFor 40 years, farmer Todd Leake and his family have battled bitter cold, hungry pests and a short growing season to coax soybeans out of their fields in eastern North Dakota.
The one thing they never had to fight for, though, was their seeds.
ianadds- Member

- Posts: 1873
Join date: 2010-01-18
Re: Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
they got the seeds in the vault..they got the terminator seeds from monsanto being supplied all over the world..the stage is set
Re: Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
I have posted this in another section, but this may be the most important article on the net:
"Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t<<Click for article
Last paragraph:
GMO as a weapon of biowarfare?
Now we come to the heart of the danger and the potential for misuse inherent in the Svalbard project of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation. Can the development of patented seeds for most of the world’s major sustenance crops such as rice, corn, wheat, and feed grains such as soybeans ultimately be used in a horrible form of biological warfare?
The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy elite families such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920’s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics,’ the systematic killing off of undesired bloodlines. Margaret Sanger, a rapid eugenicist, the founder of Planned Parenthood International and an intimate of the Rockefeller family, created something called The Negro Project in 1939, based in Harlem, which as she confided in a letter to a friend, was all about the fact that, as she put it, ‘we want to exterminate the Negro population.’ 11
A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.
In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tentanus, a sickness arising from such things as stepping on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are presumably equally liable to step on rusty nails as women.
Because of that curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the Tetanus vaccine being spread by the WHO only to women of child-bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.
It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller’s Population Council, the World Bank (home to CGIAR), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved in a 20-year-long project begun in 1972 to develop the concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault, donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine. 12
Is it a coincidence that these same organizations, from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation to the World Bank are also involved in the Svalbard seed bank project? According to Prof. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, the Pentagon is ‘now gearing up to fight and win biological warfare’ as part of two Bush national strategy directives adopted, he notes, ‘without public knowledge and review’ in 2002. Boyle adds that in 2001-2004 alone the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian bio-warfare-related work, a staggering sum.
Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright estimates that over 300 scientific institutions and some 12,000 individuals in the USA today have access to pathogens suitable for biowarfare. Alone there are 497 US Government NIH grants for research into infectious diseases with biowarfare potential. Of course this is being justified under the rubric of defending against possible terror attack as so much is today.
Many of the US Government dollars spent on biowarfare research involve genetic engineering. MIT biology professor Jonathan King says that the ‘growing bio-terror programs represent a significant emerging danger to our own population.’ King adds, ‘while such programs are always called defensive, with biological weapons, defensive and offensive programs overlap almost completely.’ 13
Time will tell whether, God Forbid, the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Bank of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation is part of another Final Solution, this involving the extinction of the Late, Great Planet Earth.
"Doomsday Seed Vault" in the Arctic Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t<<Click for article
Last paragraph:
GMO as a weapon of biowarfare?
Now we come to the heart of the danger and the potential for misuse inherent in the Svalbard project of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller foundation. Can the development of patented seeds for most of the world’s major sustenance crops such as rice, corn, wheat, and feed grains such as soybeans ultimately be used in a horrible form of biological warfare?
The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy elite families such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920’s, has embodied what they termed ‘negative eugenics,’ the systematic killing off of undesired bloodlines. Margaret Sanger, a rapid eugenicist, the founder of Planned Parenthood International and an intimate of the Rockefeller family, created something called The Negro Project in 1939, based in Harlem, which as she confided in a letter to a friend, was all about the fact that, as she put it, ‘we want to exterminate the Negro population.’ 11
A small California biotech company, Epicyte, in 2001 announced the development of genetically engineered corn which contained a spermicide which made the semen of men who ate it sterile. At the time Epicyte had a joint venture agreement to spread its technology with DuPont and Syngenta, two of the sponsors of the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault. Epicyte was since acquired by a North Carolina biotech company. Astonishing to learn was that Epicyte had developed its spermicidal GMO corn with research funds from the US Department of Agriculture, the same USDA which, despite worldwide opposition, continued to finance the development of Terminator technology, now held by Monsanto.
In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tentanus, a sickness arising from such things as stepping on a rusty nail. The vaccine was not given to men or boys, despite the fact they are presumably equally liable to step on rusty nails as women.
Because of that curious anomaly, Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization became suspicious and had vaccine samples tested. The tests revealed that the Tetanus vaccine being spread by the WHO only to women of child-bearing age contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.
It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller’s Population Council, the World Bank (home to CGIAR), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved in a 20-year-long project begun in 1972 to develop the concealed abortion vaccine with a tetanus carrier for WHO. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault, donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine. 12
Is it a coincidence that these same organizations, from Norway to the Rockefeller Foundation to the World Bank are also involved in the Svalbard seed bank project? According to Prof. Francis Boyle who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 enacted by the US Congress, the Pentagon is ‘now gearing up to fight and win biological warfare’ as part of two Bush national strategy directives adopted, he notes, ‘without public knowledge and review’ in 2002. Boyle adds that in 2001-2004 alone the US Federal Government spent $14.5 billion for civilian bio-warfare-related work, a staggering sum.
Rutgers University biologist Richard Ebright estimates that over 300 scientific institutions and some 12,000 individuals in the USA today have access to pathogens suitable for biowarfare. Alone there are 497 US Government NIH grants for research into infectious diseases with biowarfare potential. Of course this is being justified under the rubric of defending against possible terror attack as so much is today.
Many of the US Government dollars spent on biowarfare research involve genetic engineering. MIT biology professor Jonathan King says that the ‘growing bio-terror programs represent a significant emerging danger to our own population.’ King adds, ‘while such programs are always called defensive, with biological weapons, defensive and offensive programs overlap almost completely.’ 13
Time will tell whether, God Forbid, the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Bank of Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation is part of another Final Solution, this involving the extinction of the Late, Great Planet Earth.

Camerlengo- Moderator

- Posts: 62
Join date: 2010-01-11
Location: USA
Re: Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
and for the rest will be left with char;ton Heston soylent green
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070723/
seeds of destruction is @ great book
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070723/
seeds of destruction is @ great book
isabel- Member

- Posts: 328
Join date: 2010-01-20
Similar topics» Identifying GMO, Organic, and Conventional Produce and Fruits
» why does hipp organic stage 3 taste soooooo bad
» ?Identifying amber stems?
» Blobitecture The Rise of Organic Architecture
» Organic milk during Pregnancy & BF may beat allerergies
» why does hipp organic stage 3 taste soooooo bad
» ?Identifying amber stems?
» Blobitecture The Rise of Organic Architecture
» Organic milk during Pregnancy & BF may beat allerergies
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
